Source shelf
Useful evidence. No hundred-page downloads required.
Read the relevant finding, understand the limitations and open the original source. Every card has a practical question worth testing.
Healthcare · Randomized field experiment · 2026When pay isn't the strongest opening message
In this experiment, messages emphasizing pay reduced overall engagement by 7.7% relative to baseline, while social-support and benefits messaging outperformed pay-led messages.
Methodology and limitations
Population: 110,000 European nurses; cross-border recruitment to Denmark
Do not overgeneralize: This does not establish what wins for U.S. nursing campaigns or any other healthcare occupation.
Test worth running: Compare a verified pay-led headline with a verified support/benefits headline for the same vacancy.
When the language of the invitation changes response
Origin-language recruitment ads generated more initiated applications than German-language comparators for the studied audiences.
Methodology and limitations
Population: Nursing recruitment social advertising, Berlin; Arabic and Ukrainian speakers
Do not overgeneralize: A context-specific result, not a general employment targeting recommendation; follow employment advertising policies.
Test worth running: Assess whether plain-language job messaging improves understanding and application completion.
More applications doesn't always mean better applicants
Career-advancement messaging attracted some additional well-qualified applicants; flexibility attracted more entry-level applications with limited evidence of improved fit.
Methodology and limitations
Population: Technology employer; flexibility and career-opportunity advertising
Do not overgeneralize: Non-healthcare setting; use it to frame experiments, not to claim healthcare-specific outcomes.
Test worth running: Test verified career-development benefits against flexibility messaging, measuring qualified applications.
What salary transparency changes—and what it doesn't prove
The study associated transparency requirements with more salary disclosure and higher wages, without establishing a universal applicant-quality improvement.
Methodology and limitations
Population: U.S. state salary-disclosure policies
Do not overgeneralize: It does not test recruitment-ad creative variants or reveal which headline creates more qualified applicants.
Test worth running: Keep lawful pay details consistent, then test pay prominence versus another concrete job benefit.
Turn evidence into a hiring decision.
Choose the roles, audiences and messages worth testing. Your hiring plan remains yours to review and edit.
Build a hiring plan